# Step BY Step How I win \$800 per day Enjoying Roulette – 99.99% ODDS OF Successful one-HOUR TUTORIAL

I have been actively playing now for seven-8 months straight working with THIS method I individually produced. I have gained on typical \$800 per day. without fall short. Be affected individual… a good deal of information and facts I am covering here. I frequently enjoy in las vegas and in the mid-west America.
Participate in roulette on the internet
Successful at Roulette
Successful Roulette Technique
How to win at Roulette

1. holy crap! you repeat yourself soooo much. just get to the freaking system

2. Charlie, you have a great strategy but you are still gambling.

3. Just tried it out . 6 reds 2 blacks then again 5 reds .. maybe it's more effective at live tables but vs cpu it isn't . cheers

4. This whole strategy is based on a fallacy… Bayes theorem already disproves this. He starts by saying something correct, that the probability of that series of events happening twice in a row is very small. WHERE HE FAILS is that once the event happens (the first time), the probability of it happening again IS THE SAME as the first time. Much like how flipping a coin to heads 100 times in a row is very improbable; once you've got 99 heads, the probability of the 100th head is still 50/50..

5. Hey brother Thank you so much…. can you pls send me the spreadsheet on Soulgeneticsband@gmail.com

6. I can't find the comment but there are not 38 possibilities there are two,red or black,I don't know how you can't understand that.

7. Hi Charles, I am interested in BOTH your systems. Could you do me a favor and send your spreadsheets to NYC-WOLF@web.de? I would pay for the second strategy advertised by you. Best regards from Germany. – Wolfgang

8. I'm a believer.

9. dude u talk way too much its distracting just get to the fuckin point so we all can go on with our lives….

10. Charlie stop posting this nonsense, you are teaching wrong information. You are so confident that this is correct but it is not.

11. This does not work, the math behind it is not right. In fact if it was 99.99% lightening would strike 1 in 1000 times. The math is for a 5 streak not occurring which is 1 in 35, you will go broke eventually because when lightening hits it costs you 40 times your initial bet.

I have tried this and lightening struck 4 times in 200 sequences, which is better than 1 in 35 but it will catch up with you.

12. I do not wish to troll.  I am not here to throw insults or make anyone feel foolish, but if people follow this strategy over time they will eventually get hurt.  This is based on the Gambler's Fallacy and is another version of a Martingale which faces the same problem that can not be overcome by betting sequences: negative expected value.  By betting on black or red and eliminating the possibility of losing to the zero or double zero gives you a 50/50 chance of winning each individual play.  The problem is that you are not getting a 1:1 return.  You are paying more to win that \$1.  This is a negative expected value because you are paying more then you are winning.

As long as you do not hit a sequence that busts you then you will make a profit.  This problem is binary: red or black.  When you lose you must raise your bets to bring you back to profit.  In a sequence of 7 you will have 256 possible outcomes and only one of those outcomes can bust you.  If you play through a sequence of 7 you have a 255 scenarios where you will make a profit and one scenario where you lose.  You can play through say 80 or 90 sets and come out profitable.  However if you play 256 sets your likely to bust before you reach the last set.

The Martingale System works…  until it doesn't.  When it doesn't you lose everything.  This game has a negative expectation.  In order to beat it you must overcome that negative expectation.  No betting sequence can overcome that.  You must find a way of altering the odds.  There are generally 2 ways of doing it that I know about.  Roulette bias is a wheel where there are certain numbers that come up more often then they should if it was truly random.  The reasons for this happening is that the wheel is somehow flawed.  The table might be uneven, the bearings could be worn, and a number of things that could influence what should otherwise be perfectly random.  Now the second way is to time the ball and rotor speed and calculate the general area where the ball will land.  These are cases where the player is changing the negative expected value, not just playing a system against a negative expected value.

What you are seeing here is a system against a negative expected value.  If you employ it over a large enough sample you will lose.  That is not maybe…  …you WILL LOSE.  Negative expectation can not be overcome by placing different size bets no matter how complex your system is.  The idea was intriguing, but ultimately math is able to disprove it.  I am not a mathematician so it took me longer then it should have to recognize it.  I do not want to see people get hurt.  There are a lot of views on these videos so there are a lot of people that can potentially get sucked into this and get burned.  I am not slamming Charlie here.  I have been sucked in many times by the Martingale.  I still study different ways to employ this idea and trying to get this system to work into a positive expectation.

13. Guys, I think I have invented a better system. I just put \$500 on Red and won \$1000, giving me a profit of \$500 in 10sec. I then pulled out and saved myself 6 hrs of play time for the day! If you send me \$100 I'll let you know my secret system 🙂

14. u so full of sh ur eyes are brown

15. Charley I have decided one thing for sure. You have lost your mind.

16. i lost 53,800 waiting for black to hit so i could get my money back never happened

17. there is no system to beat roulette.please do not post bullshit.you are a moron

18. Insane, I make £28000 in 2 days every week using this system! It's so good you don't even need to buy the quicker system he wants to sell you at the end!!!! I'm not even gambling!! Sure I put large amounts of money on a game of chance, but I'm not a gambler!! Thanks so much

19. come on bro, are you crazy? we have all done this and tried these systems, they dont work. A massive flaw in your system is this…..

During my trial and error phase of beating roulette i have tried loads and loads of these "systems", and you my friend are just getting very lucky, as you are going to go broke soon, why do i say this? It has happened to me before.

I have done a strategy where i wait for red or even longer to wait for, a row/column, to show up 13 times in a row, yes 13! Then i would bet on the opposite and martingale until i won, It went very well until one day i lost a lot of money. I cant believe you are advocating just taking into accunt the previous 7 spins and betting the opposite of that!

If Ed Thorp can't beat blackjack without taking into account the physics of the spinning wheel, what chance have you got by taking into account the last 7 numbers numbers.

All in all, my comment could be summarised by this, every spin is an independant event and past does not have an effect on the future, therefore, your strategy doesn't work bro.

Only game that is beating in the Casino is Blackjack, and that is by counting cards where you have an edge when the count is positive.

Good Luck and i would appreciate your reply if you haven't went broke by now!

20. hi can you send me the spreadsheet i dont know what i would have to bet on the 0 and 00
samantha.boutet@hotmail.ca

21. open bet must pay this bud doen't work 10 red straight you loose eventhing

22. Spin 1 is 50/50 Spin 2 is 50/50 Spin 3 is 50/50 spin 4, 5 , 6 and 7 are always 50/50 nothing ever changes that it would be no different if you were betting that black would not come up 7 times in a row, This is NONSENSE !!

23. Do you keep betting 5 straight spins after you find the pattern or do you start all over after you win on one spin?

24. I just don't understand fully , so I am scard to try without having a way to practice can anyone answer a few questions

25. Well, all I have been saying for years is exactly what happened to me, I got banned from the UK casinos, and the evidence to back up my claims is on my channel, spy camera inside the casino watch me predict numbers and get banned from the manager

26. just like all the other things out there like wait 7 spins then if a colour hasnt come up bet on that then if loses continue to bet

27. This shit is an absolute scam! It is garbage.

28. In one of his video Charlie said that if you have enough money you can choose any 7 pattern like ( BBRRBBR ) and play it and your chance of winning is the same as to wait and for the first 2 and play the 5 pattern. The chance of winning he said is 99.999%. He is so wrong and not a mathematicien because the chance of loosing  on a 7 pattern that you choose is 1/128. Because on a 7 pattern there is 128 combinations  and the law of probability you will hit that combination once every 128 trial
and you will go bankrup. The martingale system will never work. Donny millionnaire use exactly the same system as Charlie with a 5 pattern bet and a martingale and sell his system for \$398.
Dont be fool by these guys they are only seller not player and a lots of times they worked for the casino as consultant and put on the web these loosing system for you to play and loose all your money

29. Einstein said it was impossible to win at roulette as no system can beat maths.I wonder how much this guy gets for signing people up to online casinos?

30. Do you double up if you lose a bet like Martingale?

31. Hi, can you kindly send the spreadsheet to guitardaher@gmail.com?
Many Thanks

32. This is BS. called me a hater if you want

33. Forget about the 2 spin that you do not play, the real play is when you bet your pattern of 5 B or R. So you have 32 different pattern to play with real money. It does not matter what happen before. Here are the 32 pattern that you bet

1- BBBBB
2- BBBBR
3- BBBRR
4- BBRRR
5- BRRRR
6- BRRBR
7- BRRBB
8- BRBBB
9- RRRRR
etc………. until you have the 32 pattern
If you play these patterns wright away at the table without waiting for the 2 first bet will have the same result
You will loose 1/32.
I do not understand why so many people don't understand that he only want to sell you a loosing system
Test the 2 system you will arrive at the same result

34. Doesn't the fact that you already let them play 2 of the 7 numbers affect the percentage of your chance to win?

35. hi i suggest this site > https://goo.gl/AThLpe